Lynda Gratton at the London Business School gave one of the best Keynote speeches that I’ve heard all year. Her talk was a tour de force on how to catalyze innovation and one of her core recommendations really hit home for me: “If you really want to be at the cutting edge of innovation, then you better make sure that 20% of your team is under the age of 27.” Lynda upholds this principle in all her business ventures.
I find this absolutely brilliant, which explains why I prefer teaching undergraduate seminars and why I always try to keep in touch with former students. Without fail, they continue to be an invaluable source of inspiration and innovative thinking.
A former student of mine, Adam White, recently introduced me to another undergraduate student at Tufts University, Rachel Brown. Rachel is a perfect example of why I value interacting with bright young minds. She wants to return to Kenya next year to identify and connect local peace initiatives in Nairobi in preparation for the 2012 elections.
Rachel was inspired by the story of Solo 7, a Kenyan graffiti artist in Kibera who drew messages of peace throughout the slum as a way to prevent violence from escalating shortly after the elections. “Imagine,” she said, “if we could identify all the Solo 7’s of Nairobi, all the individuals and local communities engaged in promoting peace.”
I understood at once why Adam recommended I meet with Rachel: Ushahidi.
I immediately told Rachel about Ushahidi, a free and open source platform that uses crowdsourcing to map crisis information. I suggested she consider using the platform to crowdsource and map local peace initiatives across Kenya, not just Nairobi. I’ve been so focused on crisis mapping that I’ve completely ignored my previous work in the field of conflict early warning. An integral part of this field is to monitor indicators of conflict and cooperation.
There are always pockets of cooperation no matter how dire a conflict is. Even in Nazi Germany and the Rwandan genocide we find numerous stories of people risking their lives to save others. The fact is that most people, most of the time in most places choose cooperation over conflict. If that weren’t the case, we’d be living in state of total war as described by Clausewitz.
If we only monitor indicators of war and violence, then that’s all we’ll see. Our crisis maps only depict a small part of reality. It is incredibly important that we also map indicators of peace and cooperation. By identifying the positive initiatives that exist before and during a crisis, we automatically identify multiple entry points for intervention and a host of options for conflict prevention. If we only map conflict, then we may well identify where most of the conflict is taking place, but we won’t necessarily know who in the area might be best placed to intervene.
Documenting peace and cooperation also has positive psychological effects. How often do we lament the fact that the only kind of news available in the media is bad news? We turn on CNN or BBC and there’s bad news—sometimes breaking news of bad news. It’s easy to get depressed and to assume that only bad things happen. But violence is actually very rare statistically speaking. The problem is that we don’t systematically document peace, which means that our perceptions are completely skewed.
Take the following anecdote, which occurred to me several years ago when I taught my first undergraduate course on conflict early warning systems. I was trying to describe the important psychological effects of documenting peace and cooperation by using the example of the London underground (subway).
If you’ve been to London, you’ve probably experienced the frequent problems and delays with the underground system. And like most other subway systems, announcements are made to inform passengers of annoying delays and whatnot. But unlike other subway systems I’ve used, the London underground also makes announcements to let passengers know that all lines are currently running on time.
Now lets take this principle and apply it to Rachel’s project proposal combined with Ushahidi. Imagine if she were to promote the crowdsourcing of local peace initiatives all across Kenya. She could work with national and local media to get the word out. Individuals could send text messages to report what kinds of peace activities they are involved in.
This would allow Rachel and others to follow up on select text messages to learn more about each activity. In fact, she could use Ushahidi’s customizable reporting forms to ask individuals texting in information to elaborate on their initiatives. Rachel wants to commit no less than a year to this project, which should give her and colleagues plenty of time to map hundreds of local peace initiatives across Kenya.
Just imagine a map covered with hundreds of doves or peace dots representing local peace initiatives? What a powerful image. The Peace Map would be public, so that anyone with Internet access could learn about the hundreds of different peace initiatives in Kenya. Kenyan peace activists themselves could make use of this map to learn about creative approaches to conflict prevention and conflict management. They could use Ushashidi’s subscription feature to receive automatic updates when a new peace project is reported in their neighborhood, town or province.
When peace activists (and anyone else, for that matter) find peace projects they like on Ushahidi’s Peace Map, they can “befriend” that project, much like the friend feature in Facebook. That way they can receive updates from a particular project via email, SMS or even Twitter. These updates could include information on how to get involved. When two projects (or two individuals) are connected this way, Ushahidi could depict the link on the map with a line connecting the two nodes.
Imagine if this Peace Map were then shown on national television in the lead up to the elections. Not only would there be hundreds of peace dots representing individual peace efforts, but many of these would be linked, depicting a densely connected peace network.
The map could also be printed in Kenya’s national and local newspapers. I think a Peace Map of Kenya would send a powerful message that Kenyans want peace and won’t stand for a repeat of the 2007 post-election violence. When the elections do happen, this Peace Map could be used operationally to quickly respond to any signs of escalating tensions.
Rachel could use the Peace Map to crowdsource reports of any election violence that might take place. Local peace activists could use Ushahidi’s subscription feature to receive alerts of violent events taking place in their immediate vicinity. They would receive these via email and/or SMS in near real-time.
This could allow peace activists to mobilize and quickly respond to escalating signs of violence, especially if preparedness measures and contingency plans already in place. This is what I call fourth generation conflict early warning and early response (4G). See this blog post for more on 4G systems. This is where The Third Side framework for conflict resolution meets the power of new technology platforms like Ushahidi.
It is when I meet inspiring students like Rachel that I wish I were rich so I could just write checks to turn innovative ideas into reality. The next best thing I can do is to work with Rachel and her undergraduate friends to write up a strong proposal. So if you want to get involved or you know a donor, foundation or a philanthropist who might be interested in funding Rachel’s project, please do email me so I can put you directly in touch with her: Patrick@iRevolution.net.
In the meantime, if you’re about to start a project, remember Lynda’s rule of thumb: make sure 20% of your team is under 27. You won’t regret it.
To take this one step further…how about mapping more than just initiatives, but encouraging each peace organization to map individual “incidents” of peacebuilding – mediation here, soccer game for peace there, etc., a community mural here? Can you imagine how powerful a map could be that included both events of conflict and events of peace? A visual dialog could even be formed between the two showing how peace initiatives were responding to conflict and creating an even stronger sense of peace empowerment.
I’m convinced – my only remaining question…why 27? Kind of a random number. I’d like to propose 30 😉
Great idea, Jess, I’ll be sure to share it with Rachel!
ps. I’d actually go with under 25 rule of thumb for business innovation 🙂
I’ve typically defended media’s focus on the “bad news” because I think it can provide a useful advocacy role. Getting upset, appalled, and informed is necessary (though not sufficient) to promote positive change. When local news covers good news, it is often fluff that seems to me to have no purpose.
However, in this case, promoting the good news would seem to actually have a positive role – it could do much to change the perception gap about Africa. I’m reminded of the essay on “How Not to Write About Africa” (http://www.developments.org.uk/articles/how-not-to-write-about-africa/) and the importance of portraying Africa in good light to attract investment, etc.
reading this is a little surreal as it is more or less what we did in Kenya using ushahidi in 2008 see http://peaceheroes.ushahidi.com/main
it was an award for people who had done peace activities during the violence, ppl could nominate via the site or using sms, Solo7 was indeed nominated a good few times. The winners recieved a cash prize and their story in the national newspaper.
Now we are launching Building Bridges, tomorrow, which is the follow up award, will again be mapped across kenya and will encourage people to document and update their initiatives on the site, we have links to tv programs as we work in partnership with MFOA so this award will be promoted via tv, a bit via radio but also mobile cinemas and local flyers.
So in short please get Rachel in contact with me as I am sure she can have a fruitfull addidtion, it woudl seem a shame to double efforts, thanks for your post, greetings Emer Beamer
Many thanks for your comment. Yes, I’m certainly familiar with your excellent initiative and so is everyone else at Ushahidi. Perhaps I understood Rachel wrong, but I don’t think she’s taking an awards angle to her crowdsourcing peace project. She’s taking a different approach as I’m sure you read in my blog post. Of course, the awards focus is an excellent one and I’ve highlighted your great work in many of my talks. And certainly I can see a great opportunity for synergy as well between your work and Rachel’s ideas. I guess the idea of awards is just slightly different than what Rachel was explaining to me. It is also quite different from what I was explaining in my blog post vis-a-vis the field of conflict early warning. But I could be wrong, and it’s her project, so I’ll let her follow up with you. My two cents: there can easily be two projects here as each as a different aim.
Thanks again for your comment!
Thanks to everyone for the wonderful comments and feedback! The peace mapping project has continued to expand and is now called Sisi ni Amani (“We are Peace” in Kiswahili). I am also now working with a colleague, Cody Valdes, who will be taking the year to come to Kenya and work on this project. We were able to get in contact with Emer and will be partnering on some portions of the initiative as our work is similar but both distinct and complimentary. We are looking forward to working with Butterfly Works to provide added value to one another’s projects and to contribute to the peace movement in Kenya.
We’ve also added another wonderful partner organization, Hot Sun Films (http://www.hotsunfilms.com/), which is a film school and production house that works with youth in Kibera, Kenya’s largest slum, to write and produce films using high production value equipment. The youth from Hot Sun Films will produce a series of short films featuring different peace activists, and these films will then be distributed to matatus (a major form of public transportation in Kenya that often features videos for its passengers).
If you want to be in touch please feel free to follow our Twitter account (@SisiNiAmani), or to email us at SisiNiAmani@gmail.com.
Thanks once more!
Crowd Mapping concept and theory is a good tool for analysis and gather information. Used effectively provides accurate information into sections, categories to be analysed. Crowd mapping I have seen has be uses on locality instead of national observations. Comparisons of national geographic areas are rarely used, even when it could be useful. People using Crowd Mapping should try when possible to include a wider ranging set of variables to gain a more accurate set of data.
Just came across this blog post re: some research I am doing. I’m no technical expert on crowd mapping, but the basic premise that we don’t hear enough about what’s working in this field led me to develop http://www.modelsofunity.net It’s a new site, but the aim is to feature very tightly-written case studies (accessible to a broader audience) on initiatives that are bringing people together across traditional divides, but in a way that is sustainable. It’s not a “Pollyana” approach because it includes challenges and lessons learned. But, I think any steps along this line of thinking are good ones.
do you maybe have a guide for writing case studies? At Buildingbridges.co.ke the project mentioned above, we now want to document what worked and some lessons learnt in the form of a case study for sharing. If you have a guide or format for same it might help us.
thanks for your tips or from anyone else reading.
What a fantastic idea to take a close look at what works to promote peace through a series of case studies from various areas – I think this has the potential to greatly contribute to the field of peace and conflict studies.
I think there is wonderful potential for us to be able to contribute to Models of Unity. I was able to browse the website and the examples you already have up, and believe that we will be able to submit some stunning examples of the work of our partner organizations who have chosen to tackle some of the more contentious issues surrounding violence, and potentially even of Sisi ni Amani and the impact it has on its target communities in the future. I will be sure to be in touch, and please feel free to follow our work at http://www.sisisniamani.org.
Pingback: Mobile Technologies for Conflict Management | iRevolution
Pingback: SMS for Violence Prevention: PeaceTXT International Launches in Kenya – The Ushahidi Blog
Pingback: SMS for Violence Prevention: PeaceTXT International Launches in Kenya | iRevolution
Pingback: SNA-K Launches Partnership with PeaceTXT International « Sisi ni Amani Blog
Pingback: Patrick Meier on PeaceTXT
Pingback: Existe vida más allá de Facebook >>> Ushahidi (activismo contra la brutalidad) | Ultimate Wanker Press