My 20+ page study on verifying crowdsourced information is now publicly available here as a PDF and here as an open Google Doc for comments. I very much welcome constructive feedback from iRevolution readers so I can improve the piece before it gets published in an edited book next year.
False information can cost lives. But no information can also cost lives, especially in a crisis zone. Indeed, information is perishable so the potential value of information must be weighed against the urgency of the situation. Correct information that arrives too late is useless. Crowdsourced information can provide rapid situational awareness, especially when added to a live crisis map. But information in the social media space may not be reliable or immediately verifiable. This may explain why humanitarian (and news) organizations are often reluctant to leverage crowdsourced crisis maps. Many believe that verifying crowdsourced information is either too challenging or impossible. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate that concrete strategies do exist for the verification of geo-referenced crowdsourced social media information. The study first provides a brief introduction to crisis mapping and argues that crowdsourcing is simply non-probability sampling. Next, five case studies comprising various efforts to verify social media are analyzed to demonstrate how different verification strategies work. The five case studies are: Andy Carvin and Twitter; Kyrgyzstan and Skype; BBC’s User-Generated Content Hub; the Standby Volunteer Task Force (SBTF); and U-Shahid in Egypt. The final section concludes the study with specific recommendations.
Pingback: How to Verify Social Media Content: Some Tips and Tricks on Information Forensics | iRevolution
This is a terrific idea – crowdsourcing a study on crowdsourcing!
Great stuff Patrick, thanks for this.
Hello may be of interest for the topic of this article to remember this webinar by George Chamales; it is iteresting how he “sees” the issue. http://cyphersnap.blogspot.com/2012/01/crisismappers-webinar.html
Pingback: Stranger than Fiction: A Few Words About An Ethical Compass for Crisis Mapping « GEODATA POLICY
Pingback: Trails of Trustworthiness in Real-Time Streams | iRevolution
Pingback: Truthiness as Probability: Moving Beyond the True or False Dichotomy when Verifying Social Media | iRevolution
Pingback: Social Web for Broadcast Media
Pingback: The Best of iRevolution: Four Years of Blogging | iRevolution
Pingback: Mit Crowdsourcing zu mehr Barrierefreiheit | Blind-Text
Pingback: Big Data for Development: Challenges and Opportunities | iRevolution
Pingback: Crowdsourcing for Human Rights Monitoring: Challenges and Opportunities for Information Collection & Verification | iRevolution
Pingback: Truth in the Age of Social Media: A Social Computing and Big Data Challenge | iRevolution
Pingback: Accelerating the Verification of Social Media Content | iRevolution
Pingback: Predicting the Credibility of Disaster Tweets Automatically | iRevolution
Pingback: Analyzing the Veracity of Tweets during a Major Crisis | iRevolution
Pingback: Twitter: The Internet’s Lie Detector?
Pingback: Verifying Social Media Content: The Best Links, Case Studies and Discussion | Groundswell
Pingback: Using Crowdsourcing to Counter the Spread of False Rumors on Social Media During Crises | iRevolution
Pingback: Crowdsourcing Critical Thinking to Verify Social Media During Crises | iRevolution
Pingback: Analyzing Fake Content on Twitter During Boston Marathon Bombings | iRevolution
Pingback: New Insights on How To Verify Social Media | iRevolution
Pingback: Automatically Ranking the Credibility of Tweets During Major Events | iRevolution
Pingback: Got TweetCred? Use it To Automatically Identify Credible Tweets | iRevolution